Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CRVL · against 398 other Financial Services companies
Ranked #199 of 399 · scores higher than 50% of peers · safety percentile 50
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including CRVL · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CRVL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 349 reported | 0.07× | 0.57× | 80% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 394 reported | 1.05 | 0.67 | 26% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 372 reported | 1.94× | 2.04× | 48% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 344M MYR (≈$76M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 2 | 1.0B AUD (≈$674M) | 100 | ||
| 3 | 24.8B JPY (≈$168M) | 99 | 25 | |
| 4 | 0M MYR (≈$0M) | 99 | ||
| 5 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 195 | 82M USD | 51 | 78 | |
| 196 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 832M USD |
| 51 |
| 17 |
| 197 | 37.5B THB (≈$1.0B) | 51 | 58 |
| 198 | 604M USD | 51 |
| 199 | 4.2B USD | 50 | 55 |
| 200 | 1.7B USD | 50 |
| 201 | 22M AUD (≈$14M) | 50 | 56 |
| 202 | 70.1B USD | 49 | 45 |
| 203 | 458M USD | 49 |