Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ennis, Inc.
How Ennis, Inc. stacks up
EBF · against 445 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
29/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #358 of 446 · scores higher than 19% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score42 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including EBF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 29?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 78% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -2.7% vs peer median 4.2%
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 67% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -6.5% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.3% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EBF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EBF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 462 reported | 2.3% | 8.4% | 25% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 328 reported | -6.5% | 9.2% | 30% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 437 reported | -2.7% | 5.2% | 14% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EBF| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 727M USD | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 355 | 47.7B USD | 31 | 55 | |
| 356 | 3.2B USD | 30 | 60 | |
| 356 | 37.0B USD | 30 | 54 | |
| 358 | 179.5B USD | 29 | 35 | |
| 358 | 525M USD | 29 | 74 | |
| 358 | 12.4B USD | 29 | 36 | |
| 358 | 76.6B USD | 29 | 42 | |
| 358 | 793M USD | 29 | 27 | |
| 363 | 2.3B USD | 28 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score