Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Eni S.p.A.
How Eni S.p.A. stacks up
E · against 31 other Energy companies of similar size
Valuation
47/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #15 of 32 · scores higher than 55% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score3 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including E · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 6.2% vs peer median 6.2%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 13.0% vs peer median 12.1%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 66% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.5% vs peer median 5.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = E, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | E | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 32 reported | 7.5% | 6.6% | 71% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 32 reported | 13.8% | 9.7% | 68% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 29 reported | 4.4% | 5.7% | 36% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 30 reported | 65.0% | 37.7% | 86% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around E| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.14T HKD (≈$146.3B) | 98 | 79 | |
| 2 | 108.0B USD | 79 | 55 | |
| 3 | 60.4B USD | 77 | 77 | |
| 4 | 135.8B USD | 76 | 60 | |
| 5 | 81.4B USD | 69 | 78 | |
| 11 | 89.1B USD | 55 | 59 | |
| 12 | 934.4B HKD (≈$119.6B) | 54 | 58 | |
| 13 | 122.6B USD | 52 | 32 | |
| 14 | 110.5B USD | 50 | 61 | |
| 15 | 83.6B USD | 47 | 41 | |
| 16 | 111.6B USD | 43 | 70 | |
| 17 | 81.0B USD | 41 | 47 | |
| 18 | 52.4B USD | 39 | 47 | |
| 19 | 64.3B USD | 38 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score