Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Eni S.p.A.
How Eni S.p.A. stacks up
E · against 386 other Energy companies
Valuation
47/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #204 of 387 · scores higher than 47% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score39 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including E · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 6.2% vs peer median 6.2%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 13.0% vs peer median 12.1%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 66% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.5% vs peer median 5.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = E, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | E | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 384 reported | 7.5% | 5.8% | 66% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 390 reported | 13.8% | 12.4% | 57% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 249 reported | 4.4% | 6.0% | 40% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 378 reported | 65.0% | 60.0% | 55% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around E| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 2 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 99 | 47 | |
| 200 | 3.9B USD | 48 | 72 | |
| 200 | 6.2B USD | 48 | 53 | |
| 204 | 7.9B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 47 | 39 | |
| 204 | 3.2B USD | 47 | 66 | |
| 204 | 83.6B USD | 47 | 41 | |
| 204 | 2.8B CAD (≈$2.0B) | 47 | 56 | |
| 208 | 243M MYR (≈$54M) | 46 | 41 | |
| 208 | 28.4B USD | 46 | 48 | |
| 208 | 3.8B USD | 46 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score