Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to DXP Enterprises, Inc.
How DXP Enterprises, Inc. stacks up
DXPE · against 601 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
47/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #355 of 602 · scores higher than 40% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score73 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including DXPE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.3% vs peer median 3.8%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.8% vs peer median 6.9%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.3% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DXPE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DXPE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 598 reported | 3.2% | 4.5% | 35% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 609 reported | 6.8% | 7.9% | 41% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 196 reported | 4.3% | 4.3% | 50% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 599 reported | 19.4% | 45.4% | 17% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DXPE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 5 | 22.0B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 349 | 4.0B USD | 48 | 45 | |
| 349 | 4.9B CAD (≈$3.6B) | 48 | 53 | |
| 349 | 1.7B USD | 48 | 28 | |
| 355 | 31.8B CNY (≈$4.4B) | 47 | 68 | |
| 355 | 2.8B USD | 47 | 52 | |
| 355 | 4.7B USD | 47 | 40 | |
| 355 | 5.5B USD | 47 | 29 | |
| 355 | 4.5B USD | 47 | 65 | |
| 355 | 4.9B USD | 47 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score