Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ESAB Corporation
How ESAB Corporation stacks up
ESAB · against 2,393 other Industrials companies
Valuation
47/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,258 of 2,394 · scores higher than 47% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score239 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including ESAB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.7% vs peer median 6.9%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.6% vs peer median 3.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.2% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ESAB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ESAB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 2,368 reported | 4.2% | 3.8% | 54% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2,432 reported | 7.4% | 7.0% | 52% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 795 reported | 4.2% | 3.7% | 55% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 2,381 reported | 50.1% | 50.5% | 49% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ESAB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1,258 | 39.5B TRY (≈$1.2B) | 47 | 24 | |
| 1,258 | 114M USD | 47 | 47 | |
| 1,258 | 75.7B USD | 47 | 48 | |
| 1,258 | 2.8B USD | 47 | 52 | |
| 1,258 | 4.7B USD | 47 | 40 | |
| 1,258 | 5.5B USD | 47 | 29 | |
| 1,258 | 444M USD | 47 | 78 | |
| 1,258 | 29.8B EUR (≈$32.8B) | 47 | 54 | |
| 1,258 | 1.1B USD | 47 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score