Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Darden Restaurants, Inc.
How Darden Restaurants, Inc. stacks up
DRI · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
62/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #158 of 356 · scores higher than 55% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score45 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including DRI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 10.5% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 63% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 7.5% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 68% of peers. Revenue growth: 8.1% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DRI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DRI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 8.1% | 5.9% | 59% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | 10.5% | 6.2% | 55% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | 7.5% | 4.1% | 63% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DRI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 154 | 4.2B USD | 63 | 80 | |
| 154 | 582M USD | 63 | 63 | |
| 154 | 846M USD | 63 | 60 | |
| 154 | 16.2B USD | 63 | 62 | |
| 158 | 24.8B USD | 62 | 54 | |
| 158 | 81.9B USD | 62 | 45 | |
| 158 | 188M USD | 62 | 17 | |
| 158 | 2.5B USD | 62 | 55 | |
| 162 | 39.3B USD | 61 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score