Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
DPZ · against 1,584 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #1,531 of 1,585 · scores higher than 3% of peers · safety percentile 3
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)159 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including DPZ · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | DPZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,521 reported | Not reported | 0.50× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 1,556 reported | 0.95 | 0.56 | 26% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,545 reported | 1.54× | 1.48× | 52% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 2 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 2 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 100 | 74 | |
| 5 | 61M MYR (≈$13M) | 100 | 29 | |
| 1,527 | 7.5B USD | 4 | 25 | |
| 1,528 | 1.4B GBP (≈$1.8B) | 4 | 45 | |
| 1,529 | 2.0B EUR (≈$2.1B) | 4 | 48 | |
| 1,530 | 6.1B USD | 3 | 53 | |
| 1,531 | 10.7B USD | 3 | 50 | |
| 1,532 | 350M USD | 3 | 26 | |
| 1,533 | 1.8B USD | 3 | 39 | |
| 1,534 | 1.1B USD | 3 | 35 | |
| 1,535 | 3.0B AUD (≈$2.0B) | 3 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score