Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Dorman Products, Inc.
How Dorman Products, Inc. stacks up
DORM · against 320 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
47/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #188 of 321 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score43 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including DORM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.3% vs peer median 6.1%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.0% vs peer median 8.8%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.4% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DORM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DORM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 319 reported | 5.1% | 5.4% | 47% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 326 reported | 9.5% | 9.5% | 50% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 143 reported | 5.3% | 6.3% | 42% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 323 reported | 37.5% | 43.4% | 46% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DORM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 3 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 4 | 25.5B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 83 | |
| 4 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 185 | 4.6B USD | 48 | 44 | |
| 185 | 109.3B TRY (≈$3.3B) | 48 | 52 | |
| 188 | 4.0B USD | 47 | 62 | |
| 188 | 5.9B USD | 47 | 39 | |
| 188 | 4.0B USD | 47 | 64 | |
| 188 | 4.6B USD | 47 | 39 | |
| 192 | 35.2B CNY (≈$4.9B) | 46 | 63 | |
| 192 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 46 | 67 | |
| 192 | 3.9B USD | 46 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score