Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.
How Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. stacks up
ATMU · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
46/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #832 of 1,553 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including ATMU · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 46?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.9% vs peer median 8.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.9% vs peer median 6.1%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.5% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ATMU, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ATMU | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 5.5% | 4.4% | 60% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 7.3% | 8.8% | 41% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 4.9% | 6.1% | 43% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 11.7% | 57.2% | 10% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ATMU| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 832 | 35.2B CNY (≈$4.9B) | 46 | 63 | |
| 832 | 57.3B KRW (≈$41M) | 46 | 30 | |
| 832 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 46 | 67 | |
| 832 | 28.4B EUR (≈$31.3B) | 46 | 59 | |
| 832 | 3.9B USD | 46 | 56 | |
| 832 | 14.0B USD | 46 | 47 | |
| 832 | 4.72T CLP (≈$5.2B) | 46 | 52 | |
| 832 | 12.4B THB (≈$347M) | 46 | 34 | |
| 832 | 10.7B USD | 46 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score