Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Dorman Products, Inc.
How Dorman Products, Inc. stacks up
DORM · against 327 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
47/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #205 of 328 · scores higher than 37% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score41 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including DORM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -0.1% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.3% vs peer median 3.7%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.0% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DORM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DORM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 328 reported | 3.3% | 5.0% | 39% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 280 reported | -0.1% | 7.6% | 38% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 326 reported | 5.0% | 5.5% | 46% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DORM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 177.5B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | ||
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 3 | 27.1B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 99 | 35 | |
| 3 | 272.3B INR (≈$3.3B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 5 | 17.6B SAR (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 68 | |
| 200 | 2.6B EUR (≈$2.9B) | 48 | 63 | |
| 200 | 147.3B MXN (≈$8.0B) | 48 | 73 | |
| 200 | 2.6B USD | 48 | 49 | |
| 205 | 29.9B CNY (≈$4.2B) | 47 | 67 | |
| 205 | 4.0B USD | 47 | 64 | |
| 205 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 47 | 49 | |
| 205 | 4.4B USD | 47 | 45 | |
| 209 | 3.7B USD | 46 | 66 | |
| 209 | 5.1B USD | 46 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score