Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Dorman Products, Inc.
How Dorman Products, Inc. stacks up
DORM · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
47/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #174 of 356 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score52 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including DORM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.3% vs peer median 6.1%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.0% vs peer median 8.8%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.4% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DORM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DORM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 5.1% | 4.3% | 60% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 9.5% | 8.4% | 61% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 325 reported | 5.3% | 5.3% | 50% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 37.5% | 35.8% | 51% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DORM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 2 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 4 | 395M USD | 96 | 59 | |
| 4 | 114.1B USD | 96 | 91 | |
| 170 | 20.5B USD | 48 | 50 | |
| 170 | 1.5B USD | 48 | 44 | |
| 174 | 4.0B USD | 47 | 62 | |
| 174 | 5.9B USD | 47 | 39 | |
| 174 | 4.0B USD | 47 | 64 | |
| 174 | 255M USD | 47 | 35 | |
| 174 | 4.6B USD | 47 | 39 | |
| 174 | 18.3B USD | 47 | 55 | |
| 180 | 3.9B USD | 46 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score