Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to D.R. Horton, Inc.
How D.R. Horton, Inc. stacks up
DHI · against 67 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
58/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #18 of 68 · scores higher than 75% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score6 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including DHI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 58?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.6% vs peer median 8.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 7.9% vs peer median 6.1%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 75% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.5% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DHI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DHI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 65 reported | 7.4% | 4.0% | 80% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 69 reported | 8.9% | 6.9% | 72% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 41 reported | 7.9% | 4.2% | 78% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 65 reported | 58.4% | 15.6% | 75% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DHI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 219.5B CNY (≈$30.7B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 2 | 37.54T KRW (≈$27.0B) | 97 | 65 | |
| 3 | 4.04T JPY (≈$27.5B) | 93 | 76 | |
| 4 | 31.01T KRW (≈$22.3B) | 91 | 59 | |
| 5 | 200.3B HKD (≈$25.6B) | 88 | 55 | |
| 14 | 39.3B USD | 68 | 53 | |
| 15 | 34.3B USD | 67 | 60 | |
| 16 | 24.2B USD | 65 | 66 | |
| 17 | 36.3B USD | 63 | 49 | |
| 18 | 40.6B USD | 58 | 61 | |
| 19 | 526.8B ZAR (≈$29.0B) | 54 | 59 | |
| 20 | 21.7B USD | 53 | 58 | |
| 20 | 77.5B USD | 53 | 26 | |
| 20 | 24.1B USD | 53 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score