Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
DFPH · against 273 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #248 of 274 · scores higher than 7% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score40 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including DFPH · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
| Metric | DFPH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 264 reported | 0.0% | 4.4% | 24% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 279 reported | -0.1% | 9.3% | 12% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 78 reported | -0.1% | 5.8% | 21% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 266 reported | 0.2% | 65.1% | 2% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 3 | 1.7B HKD (≈$218M) | 98 | 75 | |
| 3 | 1.7B HKD (≈$223M) | 98 | 73 | |
| 3 | 2.5B BRL (≈$443M) | 98 | 69 | |
| 242 | 364M USD | 7 | 26 | |
| 248 | 597M USD | 5 | 22 | |
| 248 | 3.1B NOK (≈$298M) | 5 | 12 | |
| 248 | 11.0B TRY (≈$330M) | 5 | 25 | |
| 248 | 436M USD | 5 | 24 | |
| 248 | 400M USD | 5 | 34 | |
| 248 | 253M USD | 5 | 18 | |
| 248 | 272M USD | 5 | 47 | |
| 255 | 2.6B CNY (≈$370M) | 4 | 38 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score