Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MGPI · against 798 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #740 of 799 · scores higher than 7% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score76 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including MGPI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
| Metric | MGPI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 771 reported | -66.2% | 4.5% | 1% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 812 reported | 12.6% | 8.9% | 71% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 312 reported | 0.2% | 6.3% | 15% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 767 reported | 162.3% | 54.4% | 91% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 101M SGD (≈$77M) | 100 | 89 | |
| 5 | 456M HKD (≈$58M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 740 | 2.2B CNY (≈$308M) | 7 | 28 | |
| 740 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 6.5B CNY (≈$907M) |
| 7 |
| 16 |
| 740 | 3.9B CNY (≈$541M) | 7 | 15 |
| 740 | 83M MYR (≈$18M) | 7 | 38 |
| 740 | 364M USD | 7 | 26 |
| 748 | 355M SAR (≈$96M) | 5 | 9 |
| 748 | 218M MYR (≈$48M) | 5 | 51 |
| 748 | 238M SAR (≈$64M) | 5 | 3 |
| 748 | 4.0B SAR (≈$1.1B) | 5 | 14 |