Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
OTLY · against 798 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #748 of 799 · scores higher than 5% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score76 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including OTLY · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
| Metric | OTLY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 771 reported | -53.0% | 4.5% | 2% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 812 reported | -1.8% | 8.9% | 6% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 312 reported | -10.1% | 6.3% | 5% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 767 reported | -9.7% | 54.4% | 1% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 101M SGD (≈$77M) | 100 | 89 | |
| 5 | 456M HKD (≈$58M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 748 | 436M USD | 5 | 24 | |
| 748 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 549M NOK (≈$52M) |
| 5 |
| 26 |
| 748 | 182M USD | 5 | 16 |
| 748 | 400M USD | 5 | 34 |
| 748 | 253M USD | 5 | 18 |
| 748 | 272M USD | 5 | 47 |
| 764 | 11.6B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 4 | 21 |
| 764 | 6.6B CNY (≈$920M) | 4 | 29 |
| 764 | 6.6B CNY (≈$927M) | 4 | 27 |