Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Diageo plc
How Diageo plc stacks up
DEO · against 38 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Growth
15/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #38 of 39 · scores higher than 3% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score3 peers with a growth score of 10–19, including DEO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 15?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 92% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -61.4% vs peer median 1.5%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 73% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -0.6% vs peer median 3.7%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 66% of peers. Revenue growth: -0.7% vs peer median 2.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DEO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DEO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 39 reported | -0.7% | 3.9% | 21% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 37 reported | -61.4% | 10.0% | 3% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 39 reported | -0.6% | 3.6% | 21% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DEO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 72.6B EUR (≈$79.8B) | 96 | 79 | |
| 2 | 503.8B HKD (≈$64.5B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 3 | 92.4B USD | 90 | 73 | |
| 4 | 47.3B USD | 88 | 47 | |
| 5 | 2.19T INR (≈$26.3B) | 87 | 59 | |
| 33 | 34.7B USD | 27 | 44 | |
| 35 | 29.9B EUR (≈$32.9B) | 24 | 49 | |
| 36 | 287.6B BRL (≈$51.8B) | 19 | 39 | |
| 36 | 39.5B USD | 19 | 26 | |
| 38 | 52.3B USD | 15 | 25 | |
| 39 | 293.3B CNY (≈$41.1B) | 2 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score