Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
DEI · against 213 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Ranked #205 of 214 · scores higher than 4% of peers · safety percentile 6
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)13 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including DEI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | DEI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 212 reported | 1.63× | 0.83× | 12% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 208 reported | 1.21 | 0.73 | 16% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 214 reported | 0.55× | 1.04× | 31% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 97 | 88 | |
| 2 | 3.3B USD | 97 | 78 | |
| 3 | 2.4B USD | 94 | 52 | |
| 4 | 44.3B TWD (≈$1.4B) | 93 | 94 | |
| 5 | 180.1B JPY (≈$1.2B) | 93 | 77 | |
| 201 | 10.7B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 11 | 60 | |
| 202 | 2.0B GBP (≈$2.6B) | 9 | 26 | |
| 203 | 1.2B USD | 8 | 41 | |
| 204 | 11.0B HKD (≈$1.4B) | 8 | 52 | |
| 205 | 2.0B USD | 6 | 24 | |
| 206 | 2.9B USD | 5 | 67 | |
| 207 | 8.2B HKD (≈$1.0B) | 5 | 9 | |
| 208 | 1.3B USD | 4 | 14 | |
| 209 | 996M USD | 3 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score