Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
DEI · against 183 other Real Estate companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #158 of 184 · scores higher than 14% of peers · safety percentile 6
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)35 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including DEI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | DEI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 177 reported | 1.63× | 1.12× | 32% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 179 reported | 1.21 | 1.02 | 29% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 185 reported | 0.55× | 1.22× | 21% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.4B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 2 | 351M USD | 97 | 40 | |
| 3 | 3.4B USD | 97 | 78 | |
| 4 | 2.5B USD | 97 | 88 | |
| 5 | 27.8B USD | 97 | 78 | |
| 154 | 4.6B USD | 8 | 49 | |
| 155 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| Unavailable |
| 7 |
| 46 |
| 156 | 548M USD | 7 | 29 |
| 157 | Unavailable | 7 | 39 |
| 158 | 2.1B USD | 6 | 24 |
| 159 | 2.9B USD | 6 | 67 |
| 160 | 404M USD | 5 | 35 |
| 161 | 876M USD | 5 | 24 |
| 162 | 16.0B USD | 5 | 50 |