Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Darling Ingredients Inc.
How Darling Ingredients Inc. stacks up
DAR · against 147 other Consumer Defensive companies listed in US-listed
Growth
91/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #18 of 148 · scores higher than 88% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score21 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including DAR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 91?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 81% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -2.5% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 86% of peers. Revenue growth: 14.9% vs peer median 2.8%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 98% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 468.9% vs peer median 1.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DAR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DAR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 152 reported | 14.9% | 4.1% | 83% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 109 reported | 468.9% | 4.5% | 98% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 147 reported | -2.5% | 3.5% | 17% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DAR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.5B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 2 | 536M USD | 99 | 39 | |
| 3 | 3.3B USD | 98 | 71 | |
| 3 | 607M USD | 98 | 67 | |
| 5 | 3.5B USD | 97 | 73 | |
| 14 | 336M USD | 93 | 63 | |
| 14 | 7.6B USD | 93 | 33 | |
| 16 | 7.5B USD | 92 | 43 | |
| 16 | 172M USD | 92 | 63 | |
| 18 | 8.5B USD | 91 | 61 | |
| 19 | 18.2B USD | 90 | 43 | |
| 19 | 92.4B USD | 90 | 73 | |
| 19 | 1.3B USD | 90 | 66 | |
| 22 | 12.9B USD | 89 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score