Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to BBB Foods Inc.
How BBB Foods Inc. stacks up
TBBB · against 806 other Consumer Defensive companies
Growth
93/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #54 of 807 · scores higher than 93% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score85 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including TBBB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 93?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- Earnings per share turned from a profit to a loss. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 1.5%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 96% of peers. Revenue growth: 36.1% vs peer median 2.8%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 98% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 33.9% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TBBB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TBBB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 813 reported | 36.1% | 2.8% | 96% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 595 reported | Not reported | 1.4% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 801 reported | 33.9% | 3.7% | 98% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TBBB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 945M EUR (≈$1.0B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 30.7B BRL (≈$5.5B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 5.5B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 82.5B JPY (≈$561M) | 99 | 69 | |
| 4 | 2.4B CNY (≈$329M) | 99 | 29 | |
| 54 | 89.8B JPY (≈$610M) | 93 | 75 | |
| 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score