Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
DAKT · against 597 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #365 of 598 · scores higher than 39% of peers · safety percentile 44
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)48 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including DAKT · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | DAKT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 575 reported | 0.05× | 0.22× | 75% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 577 reported | 1.68 | 0.68 | 8% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 595 reported | 2.17× | 1.88× | 59% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 3 | 553M EUR (≈$608M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 4 | 6.6B CNY (≈$922M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 5 | 3.8B CNY (≈$530M) | 99 | 54 | |
| 361 | 1.5B USD | 45 | 77 | |
| 362 | 1.1B AUD (≈$709M) | 45 | 46 | |
| 363 | 952M USD | 45 | 46 | |
| 364 | 4.2B CNY (≈$586M) | 44 | 51 | |
| 365 | 937M USD | 44 | 74 | |
| 366 | 5.4B ILS (≈$1.5B) | 44 | 63 | |
| 367 | 1.4B USD | 44 | 50 | |
| 368 | 785M USD | 44 | 51 | |
| 369 | 9.0B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 44 | 38 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score