Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CWT · against 359 other Utilities companies
Ranked #200 of 360 · scores higher than 45% of peers · safety percentile 45
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)36 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including CWT · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker current ratio than most Utilities peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CWT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 354 reported | 0.93× | 1.21× | 63% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 347 reported | 0.48 | 0.40 | 41% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 347 reported | 0.70× | 1.05× | 23% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.9B CNY (≈$260M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1 | 1.6B BRL (≈$297M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 1 | 1.6B BRL (≈$286M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1 | 369M USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2.7B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 196 | 131.1B THB (≈$3.7B) | 46 | 38 | |
| 197 | 604.8B INR (≈$7.3B) | 45 | 53 | |
| 198 | 21.1B CNY (≈$3.0B) | 45 | 77 | |
| 199 | 76.7B MYR (≈$16.9B) | 45 | 58 | |
| 200 | 3.0B USD | 45 | 44 | |
| 201 | 6.4B USD | 44 | 45 | |
| 202 | 4.3B CNY (≈$601M) | 44 | 40 | |
| 203 | 5.3B USD | 44 | 44 | |
| 204 | 1.5B USD | 43 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score