Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to California Water Service Group
How California Water Service Group stacks up
CWT · against 351 other Utilities companies
Growth
63/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #130 of 352 · scores higher than 63% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score35 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including CWT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 63?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Utilities peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 63% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -5.8% vs peer median 1.7%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.9% vs peer median 2.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 85% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 9.9% vs peer median 2.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CWT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CWT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 354 reported | 3.9% | 2.5% | 54% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 284 reported | -5.8% | 1.6% | 37% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 351 reported | 9.9% | 2.0% | 85% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CWT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 48.3B BRL (≈$8.7B) | 100 | 69 | |
| 1 | 9.1B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 3 | 7.9B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 85 | |
| 3 | 636M EUR (≈$700M) | 99 | 64 | |
| 3 | 2.5B USD | 99 | 41 | |
| 126 | 23.3B USD | 64 | 78 | |
| 126 | 28.0B USD | 64 | 46 | |
| 126 | 2.1B USD | 64 | 50 | |
| 130 | 730.6B CNY (≈$102.3B) | 63 | 50 | |
| 130 | 3.0B USD | 63 | 44 | |
| 130 | 493.8B CLP (≈$543M) | 63 | 66 | |
| 133 | 15.7B CNY (≈$2.2B) | 62 | 43 | |
| 133 | 98.6B USD | 62 | 52 | |
| 133 | 575.4B CLP (≈$633M) | 62 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score