Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Carvana Co.
How Carvana Co. stacks up
CVNA · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
22/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #1,204 of 1,553 · scores higher than 22% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including CVNA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 22?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 76% of peers. EBITDA yield: 4.3% vs peer median 8.8%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 76% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 1.2% vs peer median 6.1%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 64% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.0% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CVNA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CVNA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 2.7% | 4.4% | 36% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 4.3% | 8.8% | 24% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 1.2% | 6.1% | 24% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 7.9% | 57.2% | 7% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CVNA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1,204 | 3.3B CNY (≈$455M) | 22 | 24 | |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score