Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to EIDP, Inc.
How EIDP, Inc. stacks up
CTA-PA · against 182 other Basic Materials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
49/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #123 of 183 · scores higher than 32% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score9 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including CTA-PA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 49?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Basic Materials norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.9% vs peer median 3.4%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: -0.1% vs peer median -0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CTA-PA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CTA-PA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 187 reported | 2.9% | 9.9% | 30% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 102 reported | Not reported | 17.1% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 180 reported | -0.1% | 1.5% | 40% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CTA-PA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.8B USD | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 8.9B USD | 100 | 85 | |
| 3 | 41.2B USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 3 | 6.0B USD | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 15.9B USD | 99 | 75 | |
| 119 | 13.4B USD | 54 | 52 | |
| 119 | 82.7B USD | 54 | 45 | |
| 119 | 10.3B USD | 54 | 68 | |
| 119 | 768M USD | 54 | 80 | |
| 123 | Unavailable | 49 | 59 | |
| 123 | 942M USD | 49 | 44 | |
| 125 | 986M USD | 46 | 59 | |
| 125 | 132.7B USD | 46 | 64 | |
| 127 | 5.9B USD | 45 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score