Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cisco Systems, Inc.
How Cisco Systems, Inc. stacks up
CSCO · against 478 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Growth
57/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #285 of 479 · scores higher than 40% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score47 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including CSCO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.6% vs peer median 4.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 11.8% vs peer median 8.5%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 67% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 30.7% vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CSCO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CSCO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 496 reported | 11.8% | 13.1% | 46% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 286 reported | 30.7% | 22.4% | 56% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 471 reported | 3.6% | 9.7% | 32% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CSCO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 965.7B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 280 | 785M USD | 58 | 51 | |
| 280 | 37.5B USD | 58 | 56 | |
| 280 | 286.5B USD | 58 | 39 | |
| 285 | 303.1B USD | 57 | 58 | |
| 285 | 406.0B USD | 57 | 54 | |
| 287 | 1.9B USD | 56 | 53 | |
| 287 | 2.8B USD | 56 | 67 | |
| 289 | 2.5B USD | 55 | 51 | |
| 289 | 2.4B USD | 55 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score