Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to NetApp, Inc.
How NetApp, Inc. stacks up
NTAP · against 1,668 other Technology companies
Growth
58/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #694 of 1,669 · scores higher than 58% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score167 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including NTAP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 58?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.0% vs peer median 4.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 61% of peers. Revenue growth: 12.2% vs peer median 8.5%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 62% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 23.1% vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = NTAP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | NTAP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,689 reported | 12.2% | 8.5% | 61% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,071 reported | 23.1% | 11.1% | 62% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,659 reported | 6.0% | 4.8% | 55% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around NTAP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 694 | 867M USD | 58 | 56 | |
| 694 | 1.7B BRL (≈$307M) | 58 | 52 | |
| 694 | 785M USD | 58 | 51 | |
| 694 | 62.6B INR (≈$752M) | 58 | 75 | |
| 694 | 37.5B USD | 58 | 56 | |
| 694 | 286.5B USD | 58 | 39 | |
| 710 | 9.2B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 57 | 40 | |
| 710 | 1429.37T KRW (≈$1.03T) | 57 | 76 | |
| 710 | 12.0B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 57 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score