Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CRVS · against 499 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #37 of 500 · scores higher than 93% of peers · safety percentile 93
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)56 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including CRVS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CRVS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 468 reported | 0.00× | 0.18× | 94% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 476 reported | 0.86 | 0.42 | 28% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 492 reported | 16.16× | 2.79× | 95% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 3 | 1.1B USD | 100 | ||
| 4 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 35 | |
| 5 | 421M USD | 99 | 52 | |
| 33 | 3.9B CNY (≈$540M) | 94 | 71 | |
| 34 | 1.5B USD | 94 | 93 | |
| 35 | 5.0B CNY (≈$706M) | 94 | 63 | |
| 36 | 1.4B USD | 94 | 38 | |
| 37 | 827M USD | 93 | 41 | |
| 38 | 1.3B USD | 93 | 44 | |
| 39 | 1.5B USD | 93 | 39 | |
| 40 | 469M USD | 93 | 50 | |
| 41 | 884M USD | 93 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score