Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MNPR · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #98 of 1,373 · scores higher than 93% of peers · safety percentile 93
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)138 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including MNPR · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MNPR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.00× | 0.24× | 98% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 1.50 | 0.53 | 11% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 33.56× | 2.62× | 99% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 94 | 26.0B USD | 93 | 28 | |
| 95 | 1.3B USD |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 44 |
| 96 | 18.0B CNY (≈$2.5B) | 93 | 80 |
| 97 | 1.5B USD | 93 | 39 |
| 98 | 469M USD | 93 | 50 |
| 99 | 884M USD | 93 | 75 |
| 100 | 15.6B DKK (≈$2.3B) | 93 | 96 |
| 101 | 1.2B USD | 93 | 40 |
| 102 | 1.8B USD | 93 | 79 |