Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CRVS · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #91 of 1,373 · scores higher than 93% of peers · safety percentile 93
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)138 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including CRVS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CRVS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.00× | 0.24× | 95% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 0.86 | 0.53 | 31% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 16.16× | 2.62× | 94% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 87 | 356M AUD (≈$235M) | 94 | 81 | |
| 87 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 256M USD |
| 94 |
| 80 |
| 89 | 1.4B USD | 94 | 38 |
| 90 | 8.8B USD | 94 | 50 |
| 91 | 827M USD | 93 | 41 |
| 92 | 83.4B KRW (≈$60M) | 93 | 36 |
| 93 | 3.0B USD | 93 | 54 |
| 94 | 26.0B USD | 93 | 28 |
| 95 | 1.3B USD | 93 | 44 |