Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CRVL · against 74 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Ranked #33 of 75 · scores higher than 57% of peers · safety percentile 50
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)6 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including CRVL · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CRVL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 69 reported | 0.07× | 0.78× | 84% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 77 reported | 1.05 | 0.73 | 32% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 65 reported | 1.94× | 2.40× | 42% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 231.2B INR (≈$2.8B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 2 | 7.1B EUR (≈$7.8B) | 93 | ||
| 3 | 5.0B USD | 92 | 47 | |
| 4 | 2.1B USD | 90 | ||
| 5 | 4.3B USD | 89 | 62 | |
| 29 | 23.7B CNY (≈$3.3B) | 57 | 59 | |
| 30 | 5.3B GBP (≈$6.9B) | 56 | 79 | |
| 31 | 4.9B USD | 52 | 38 | |
| 32 | 3.9B AUD (≈$2.6B) | 52 | 43 | |
| 33 | 4.2B USD | 50 | 55 | |
| 34 | 2.1B USD | 47 | 71 | |
| 35 | 5.9B EUR (≈$6.5B) | 44 | 43 | |
| 36 | 5.3B USD | 43 | 52 | |
| 37 | 7.1B USD | 42 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score