Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CRC · against 116 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #90 of 117 · scores higher than 23% of peers · safety percentile 23
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)15 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including CRC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CRC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 117 reported | 0.40× | 0.55× | 63% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 117 reported | 1.02 | 0.51 | 9% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 115 reported | 0.66× | 1.54× | 9% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 2 | 4.4B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 3 | 5.2B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 4 | 14.8B ILS (≈$4.0B) | 97 | 63 | |
| 5 | 3.2B USD | 96 | 66 | |
| 86 | 5.5B GBP (≈$7.2B) | 26 | 32 | |
| 87 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 25 | 65 | |
| 88 | 33.3B SAR (≈$9.0B) | 25 | 40 | |
| 89 | 7.0B USD | 25 | 44 | |
| 90 | 4.6B USD | 23 | 17 | |
| 91 | 6.6B USD | 22 | 28 | |
| 92 | 4.1B USD | 22 | 56 | |
| 93 | 19.7B CNY (≈$2.8B) | 22 | 17 | |
| 94 | 6.1B EUR (≈$6.7B) | 21 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score