Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SEI · against 398 other Energy companies
Ranked #301 of 399 · scores higher than 25% of peers · safety percentile 25
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including SEI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SEI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 392 reported | 2.17× | 0.49× | 8% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 392 reported | 1.26 | 0.48 | 5% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 395 reported | 4.12× | 1.37× | 93% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 4 | 41M USD | 99 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 297 | 9.6B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 26 | 37 | |
| 298 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) |
| 25 |
| 65 |
| 299 | 33.3B SAR (≈$9.0B) | 25 | 40 |
| 300 | 28.7B USD | 25 | 37 |
| 301 | 7.0B USD | 25 | 44 |
| 302 | 1.0B USD | 24 | 24 |
| 303 | 336M USD | 24 | 27 |
| 304 | 83.2B JPY (≈$566M) | 24 | 39 |
| 305 | 1.29T INR (≈$15.5B) | 24 | 56 |