Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Coupang, Inc.
How Coupang, Inc. stacks up
CPNG · against 97 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
57/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #65 of 98 · scores higher than 33% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score10 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including CPNG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 74% of peers. Revenue growth: 9.9% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings per share turned from a profit to a loss. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 85% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 17.1% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CPNG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CPNG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 98 reported | 9.9% | 8.7% | 54% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 86 reported | 37.5% | 10.8% | 71% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 98 reported | 17.1% | 9.5% | 74% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CPNG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 15.2B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 62 | 200.3B HKD (≈$25.6B) | 60 | 55 | |
| 63 | 51.5B USD | 59 | 50 | |
| 63 | 19.7B USD | 59 | 62 | |
| 65 | 198.5B CNY (≈$27.8B) | 57 | 70 | |
| 65 | 27.4B USD | 57 | 23 | |
| 67 | 44.1B USD | 52 | 35 | |
| 68 | 22.7B USD | 51 | 55 | |
| 69 | 37.54T KRW (≈$27.0B) | 50 | 65 | |
| 69 | 31.01T KRW (≈$22.3B) | 50 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score