Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Copa Holdings, S.A.
How Copa Holdings, S.A. stacks up
CPA · against 2,399 other Industrials companies
Growth
55/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,069 of 2,400 · scores higher than 55% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score240 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including CPA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 55?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.0% vs peer median 4.4%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 10.5% vs peer median 7.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 62% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 6.9% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CPA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CPA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 2,422 reported | 5.0% | 4.4% | 52% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,764 reported | 10.5% | 7.1% | 55% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 2,385 reported | 6.9% | 4.2% | 62% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CPA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.9B CNY (≈$682M) | 100 | 44 | |
| 1 | 9.4B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1,069 | 65.7B JPY (≈$446M) | 55 | 74 | |
| 1,069 | 22.15T JPY (≈$150.6B) | 55 | 60 | |
| 1,069 | 6.4B JPY (≈$44M) | 55 | 57 | |
| 1,069 | 248.8B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 55 | 77 | |
| 1,069 | 5.6B USD | 55 | 66 | |
| 1,069 | 462M USD | 55 | 86 | |
| 1,069 | 6.4B CHF (≈$7.4B) | 55 | 63 | |
| 1,069 | 35.1B EUR (≈$38.6B) | 55 | 50 | |
| 1,069 | 773M AUD (≈$510M) | 55 | 73 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score