Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
How Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited stacks up
CP · against 73 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
60/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #33 of 74 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score11 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including CP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 60?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Industrials peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 64% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -3.4% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.6% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 84% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 14.8% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 74 reported | 3.6% | 7.4% | 26% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 69 reported | -3.4% | 8.6% | 25% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 73 reported | 14.8% | 6.6% | 83% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 2 | 90.8B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 3 | 63.3B CAD (≈$46.2B) | 95 | 56 | |
| 3 | 51.7B USD | 95 | 58 | |
| 5 | 103.7B GBP (≈$134.9B) | 94 | 59 | |
| 30 | 47.9B EUR (≈$52.7B) | 63 | 56 | |
| 31 | 60.7B GBP (≈$78.9B) | 62 | 48 | |
| 32 | 49.7B USD | 61 | 50 | |
| 33 | 5.85T JPY (≈$39.8B) | 60 | 62 | |
| 33 | 79.3B USD | 60 | 50 | |
| 33 | 91.8B USD | 60 | 54 | |
| 36 | 6.21T JPY (≈$42.2B) | 59 | 53 | |
| 36 | 73.1B USD | 59 | 47 | |
| 36 | 93.8B USD | 59 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score