Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
COST · against 820 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #79 of 821 · scores higher than 90% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score87 peers with a profitability score of 90–100, including COST · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its return on invested capital and return on assets, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
| Metric | COST | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 759 reported | 43.8% | 7.6% | 95% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 815 reported | 3.8% | 7.6% | 29% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 782 reported | 10.2% | 3.9% | 90% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 769 reported | 28.4% | 8.3% | 93% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 824 reported | 12.8% | 32.0% | 13% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 478.0B INR (≈$5.7B) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 235.4B INR (≈$2.8B) | 100 | 68 | |
| 1 | 224.7B INR (≈$2.7B) | 100 | 70 | |
| 4 | 390.1B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 99 | 70 | |
| 4 | 3.9B MYR (≈$864M) | 99 | 72 | |
| 79 | 4.4B CNY (≈$611M) | 90 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 65 |
| 79 | 16.0B CNY (≈$2.2B) | 90 | 66 |
| 79 | 26.3B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 90 | 77 |
| 79 | 267.9B JPY (≈$1.8B) | 90 | 75 |
| 79 | 417.7B USD | 90 | 52 |
| 79 | 21.8B USD | 90 | 66 |
| 79 | 3.6B USD | 90 | 60 |
| 79 | 2.9B THB (≈$80M) | 90 | 68 |
| 79 | 131.3B USD | 90 | 53 |