Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ConocoPhillips
How ConocoPhillips stacks up
COP · against 16 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #9 of 17 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score1 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including COP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: -1.7% vs peer median -1.3%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 5.1% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 70% of peers. Revenue growth: 9.6% vs peer median 0.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = COP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | COP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 17 reported | 9.6% | 8.7% | 75% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 17 reported | 5.1% | 16.0% | 44% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 17 reported | -1.7% | -2.9% | 63% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around COP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 120.0B USD | 94 | 62 | |
| 1 | 109.0B USD | 94 | 58 | |
| 3 | 111.6B USD | 92 | 70 | |
| 4 | 109.1B USD | 85 | 37 | |
| 5 | 110.5B USD | 73 | 61 | |
| 6 | 17.70T INR (≈$212.4B) | 69 | 60 | |
| 6 | 163.7B EUR (≈$180.1B) | 69 | 70 | |
| 8 | 88.6B USD | 66 | 40 | |
| 9 | 173.5B USD | 57 | 65 | |
| 10 | 135.8B USD | 39 | 60 | |
| 11 | 1.14T HKD (≈$146.3B) | 35 | 79 | |
| 11 | 89.1B USD | 35 | 59 | |
| 13 | 297.1B USD | 33 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score