Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CNS · against 80 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Ranked #16 of 81 · scores higher than 81% of peers · safety percentile 76
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)6 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including CNS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CNS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 75 reported | 0.19× | 0.77× | 70% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 83 reported | 1.22 | 0.73 | 23% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 71 reported | 6.64× | 2.98× | 77% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 231.2B INR (≈$2.8B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 2 | 3.1B AUD (≈$2.1B) | 96 | 62 | |
| 3 | 169.7B INR (≈$2.0B) | 95 | 78 | |
| 4 | 5.0B USD | 92 | 47 | |
| 5 | 14.7B CNY (≈$2.1B) | 90 | 76 | |
| 12 | 588.9B JPY (≈$4.0B) | 82 | 58 | |
| 13 | 323.2B INR (≈$3.9B) | 81 | 58 | |
| 14 | 403.2B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 81 | 67 | |
| 15 | 279.7B INR (≈$3.4B) | 81 | ||
| 16 | 3.8B USD | 76 | 58 | |
| 17 | 2.0B USD | 75 | 26 | |
| 18 | 16.7B CNY (≈$2.3B) | 74 | 27 | |
| 19 | 7.0B AUD (≈$4.6B) | 73 | 37 | |
| 20 | 22.0B SEK (≈$2.2B) | 73 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score