Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cummins Inc.
How Cummins Inc. stacks up
CMI · against 81 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
38/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #62 of 82 · scores higher than 23% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score14 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including CMI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 38?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Industrials peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 68% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -7.7% vs peer median 7.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.5% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.9% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CMI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CMI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 82 reported | 2.9% | 7.5% | 26% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 75 reported | -7.7% | 7.5% | 19% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 81 reported | 2.5% | 6.6% | 31% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CMI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 2 | 90.8B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 3 | 63.3B CAD (≈$46.2B) | 95 | 56 | |
| 3 | 51.7B USD | 95 | 58 | |
| 3 | 34.8B USD | 95 | 49 | |
| 58 | 453.2B SEK (≈$45.3B) | 43 | 50 | |
| 59 | 15.68T JPY (≈$106.6B) | 39 | 41 | |
| 59 | 75.7B USD | 39 | 48 | |
| 59 | 81.6B USD | 39 | 46 | |
| 62 | 68.9B USD | 38 | 50 | |
| 62 | 49.9B USD | 38 | 42 | |
| 64 | 45.2B USD | 37 | 47 | |
| 64 | 91.3B USD | 37 | 45 | |
| 66 | 94.0B USD | 36 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score