Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cummins Inc.
How Cummins Inc. stacks up
CMI · against 445 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
38/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #325 of 446 · scores higher than 27% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score39 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including CMI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 38?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Industrials peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 68% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -7.7% vs peer median 7.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.5% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.9% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CMI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CMI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 462 reported | 2.9% | 8.4% | 27% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 328 reported | -7.7% | 9.2% | 29% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 437 reported | 2.5% | 5.2% | 36% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CMI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 727M USD | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 319 | 323M USD | 39 | 82 | |
| 319 | 81.6B USD | 39 | 46 | |
| 319 | 1.9B USD | 39 | 33 | |
| 325 | 3.9B USD | 38 | 20 | |
| 325 | 68.9B USD | 38 | 50 | |
| 325 | 4.7B USD | 38 | 40 | |
| 325 | 49.9B USD | 38 | 42 | |
| 329 | 793M USD | 37 | 50 | |
| 329 | 45.2B USD | 37 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score