Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CME · against 16 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Ranked #11 of 17 · scores higher than 38% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score9 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including CME · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Financial Services peers.
| Metric | CME | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 20 reported | 3.9% | 3.7% | 68% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 13 reported | 4.3% | 5.8% | 0% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 16 reported | 3.9% | 3.9% | 47% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 20 reported | 24.3% | 21.7% | 58% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 128.0B USD | 76 | 61 | |
| 2 | 67.1B USD | 47 | 51 | |
| 3 | 70.0B USD | 44 | 53 | |
| 4 | 477.0B HKD (≈$61.1B) | 43 | 60 | |
| 5 | 96.0B USD | 38 | 48 | |
| 7 | 137.4B USD | 32 | 50 | |
| 8 | 43.6B GBP (≈$56.7B) | 30 | 48 | |
| 9 | 141.3B USD | 29 | 52 | |
| 10 | 188.7B USD | 28 | 45 | |
| 11 | 109.3B USD | 27 | 53 | |
| 12 | 90.7B USD | 25 | 33 | |
| 12 | 88.7B USD | 25 | 39 | |
| 14 | 87.2B USD | 24 | 49 | |
| 15 | 70.1B USD | 23 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score