Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CI · against 45 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #28 of 46 · scores higher than 40% of peers · safety percentile 30
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)11 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including CI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 41 reported | 0.74× | 0.50× | 23% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 44 reported | 0.30 | 0.57 | 65% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 44 reported | 0.85× | 1.72× | 7% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 327.3B CNY (≈$45.8B) | 92 | 75 | |
| 2 | 56.7B USD | 85 | 79 | |
| 3 | 8.24T JPY (≈$56.0B) | 83 | 75 | |
| 4 | 4.25T INR (≈$51.0B) | 81 | 70 | |
| 5 | 41.6B USD | 79 | 34 | |
| 24 | 54.0B USD | 32 | 47 | |
| 25 | 119.1B USD | 30 | 57 | |
| 26 | 45.6B CHF (≈$52.4B) | 30 | 55 | |
| 27 | 45.2B USD | 30 | 46 | |
| 28 | 78.1B USD | 30 | 60 | |
| 29 | 89.7B USD | 27 | 50 | |
| 30 | 50.2B USD | 25 | 49 | |
| 31 | 49.5B USD | 24 | 53 | |
| 32 | 95.4B AUD (≈$62.9B) | 24 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score