Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CI · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #967 of 1,373 · scores higher than 30% of peers · safety percentile 30
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including CI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.74× | 0.24× | 21% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 0.30 | 0.53 | 68% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 0.85× | 2.62× | 6% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 963 | 1.7B USD | 30 | 35 | |
| 964 | 433M USD | 30 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 81 |
| 965 | 327M USD | 30 | 11 |
| 966 | 551M USD | 30 | 27 |
| 967 | 78.1B USD | 30 | 60 |
| 968 | 110.9B JPY (≈$754M) | 30 | 59 |
| 969 | 101.2B JPY (≈$688M) | 29 | 54 |
| 970 | 15.7B USD | 29 | 33 |
| 971 | 190M ILS (≈$51M) | 29 |