Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Churchill Downs Incorporated
How Churchill Downs Incorporated stacks up
CHDN · against 235 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
59/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #114 of 236 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score31 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including CHDN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 59?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -3.6% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.7% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 75% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 10.9% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CHDN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CHDN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 236 reported | 5.7% | 5.7% | 50% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 205 reported | -3.6% | 6.4% | 35% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 235 reported | 10.9% | 6.1% | 70% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CHDN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27.1B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 99 | 35 | |
| 1 | 9.3B USD | 99 | 43 | |
| 3 | 17.6B SAR (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 68 | |
| 3 | 4.0B EUR (≈$4.4B) | 98 | 41 | |
| 3 | 7.0B USD | 98 | 59 | |
| 110 | 101.0B HKD (≈$12.9B) | 60 | 58 | |
| 110 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 60 | 67 | |
| 110 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 60 | 82 | |
| 110 | 6.6B USD | 60 | 42 | |
| 114 | 6.8B USD | 59 | 49 | |
| 114 | 6.5B EUR (≈$7.2B) | 59 | 58 | |
| 114 | 4.5B GBP (≈$5.8B) | 59 | 56 | |
| 117 | 1.27T JPY (≈$8.7B) | 58 | 63 | |
| 117 | 20.0B SAR (≈$5.4B) | 58 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score