Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Chagee Holdings Limited
How Chagee Holdings Limited stacks up
CHA · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
69/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #130 of 356 · scores higher than 63% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score45 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including CHA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 69?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 90% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -52.4% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.0% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 100% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 197.2% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CHA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CHA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 4.0% | 5.9% | 41% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | -52.4% | 6.2% | 13% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | 197.2% | 4.1% | 99% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CHA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 124 | 4.7B USD | 70 | 52 | |
| 124 | 2.2B USD | 70 | 64 | |
| 130 | 2.6B USD | 69 | 54 | |
| 130 | 876M USD | 69 | 44 | |
| 130 | 2.4B USD | 69 | 81 | |
| 130 | 390M USD | 69 | 59 | |
| 130 | 18.0B USD | 69 | 56 | |
| 135 | 3.9B USD | 68 | 56 | |
| 135 | 2.8B USD | 68 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score