Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
How Bloomin' Brands, Inc. stacks up
BLMN · against 1,585 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Growth
69/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #485 of 1,586 · scores higher than 69% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score158 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including BLMN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 69?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 73% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -1.3% vs peer median 4.3%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 61% of peers. Revenue growth: 1.2% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BLMN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BLMN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 1.2% | 3.7% | 39% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,125 reported | Not reported | 4.1% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,578 reported | -1.3% | 4.3% | 27% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BLMN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 241M MYR (≈$53M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 1 | 177.5B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | ||
| 485 | 4.9B CNY (≈$688M) | 69 | 45 | |
| 485 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score