Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CDW Corporation
How CDW Corporation stacks up
CDW · against 478 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Growth
40/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #358 of 479 · scores higher than 25% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score39 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including CDW · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 40?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 61% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 1.6% vs peer median 4.8%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 5.2% vs peer median 11.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.4% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CDW, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CDW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 496 reported | 7.4% | 13.1% | 31% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 286 reported | 5.2% | 22.4% | 33% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 471 reported | 1.6% | 9.7% | 28% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CDW| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 965.7B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 354 | 12.4B USD | 41 | 44 | |
| 354 | 9.8B USD | 41 | 58 | |
| 354 | 2.2B USD | 41 | 30 | |
| 354 | 190M USD | 41 | 33 | |
| 358 | 18.7B USD | 40 | 47 | |
| 358 | 4.6B USD | 40 | 13 | |
| 358 | 25.5B USD | 40 | 56 | |
| 358 | 16.9B USD | 40 | 57 | |
| 362 | 28.8B USD | 39 | 70 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score