Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cognex Corporation
How Cognex Corporation stacks up
CGNX · against 1,668 other Technology companies
Growth
41/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #977 of 1,669 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score167 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including CGNX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 41?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 69% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -0.4% vs peer median 4.8%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 9.7% vs peer median 11.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 8.7% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CGNX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CGNX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,689 reported | 8.7% | 8.5% | 51% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,071 reported | 9.7% | 11.1% | 49% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,659 reported | -0.4% | 4.8% | 31% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CGNX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 977 | 90.9B TWD (≈$2.8B) | 41 | 59 | |
| 977 | 3.6B CNY (≈$498M) | 41 | 48 | |
| 977 | 44.9B JPY (≈$305M) | 41 | 55 | |
| 977 | 12.4B USD | 41 | 44 | |
| 977 | 9.8B USD | 41 | 58 | |
| 977 | 5.3B EUR (≈$5.8B) | 41 | 47 | |
| 977 | 378M AUD (≈$250M) | 41 | 53 | |
| 977 | 2.2B USD | 41 | 30 | |
| 977 | 190M USD | 41 | 33 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score